Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was unveiled 10 months earlier than the HZ50W and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the HZ50W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung HZ50W
| EX-H10 | HZ50W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Casio EX-H10
| HZ50W | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2010 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung HZ50W
| EX-H10 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 versus the HZ50W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and HZ50W is 93 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and HZ50W.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ50W to give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Alternate name | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $250 |