Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was revealed 4 months after the SL620 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H10 scores vs the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-H10 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-H10
| SL620 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung SL620
| EX-H10 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 provides outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the SL620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and SL620 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and SL620.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs although you have to factor the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $200 |
