Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Old Model is Sigma SD1
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H10 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was introduced 3 years before the SD1 Merrill which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-H10 matches up against the SD1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
| EX-H10 | SD1 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-H10
| SD1 Merrill | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2012 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
| EX-H10 | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SD1 Merrill is 93 and 57 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and SD1 Merrill.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-H10 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will offer more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2012-04-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $2,339 |