Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ95
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS80, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS80 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-500 was unveiled 13 years before the ZS80 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS80 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-500 matches up versus the ZS80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic ZS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS80
E-500 | ZS80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Olympus E-500
ZS80 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | October 2005 | More recent by 150 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Clearer screen (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS80
E-500 | ZS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS80 has measurements of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") with a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 vs the ZS80.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and ZS80 is 70 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and ZS80.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS80 will result in greater detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS80 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DC-TZ95 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2018-02-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 327 grams (0.72 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $600 | $448 |