Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was unveiled within a month of the EX-Z35 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-H15 grades vs the EX-Z35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H15 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-Z35 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H15 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 has external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 and the EX-Z35.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and EX-Z35 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and EX-Z35.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-H15 to provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $99 |