Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2010
Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Released April 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") posses different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-H15 was released 9 months later than the Fujifilm F200EXR and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the Fujifilm F200EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 EX-H15 Fujifilm F200EXR 
ReleasedJanuary 2010April 2009More recent by 9 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-H15

 Fujifilm F200EXR EX-H15 

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F200EXR

 EX-H15 Fujifilm F200EXR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has sizing of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm F200EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H15 against the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 93 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F200EXR.

Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-H15 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Portrait photography features
Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography features
34
has manual focus
MP count decent (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
21
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Street photography details
Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography details
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-H15
Sports photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Travel photography features
Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography features
64
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-H15
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
46
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
38
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Vlogging details
Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging details
28
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic jack
28
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F200EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-H15 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-06 2009-04-30
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.3-5.1
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.30 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 161 grams (0.35 lb) 205 grams (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 NP-50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $300 $350