Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
 
               
              90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched January 2012
- Updated by Fujifilm F800EXR
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F770EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F770EXR (16MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F770EXR (1/2") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H15 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the Fujifilm F770EXR which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H15 scores against the Fujifilm F770EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm F770EXR
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm F770EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | 
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F770EXR over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm F770EXR | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 24 months | 
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F770EXR
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm F770EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | 
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen | 
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Fujifilm F770EXR has proportions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F770EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 vs the Fujifilm F770EXR.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F770EXR is 93 and 90 respectively.
 
          Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F770EXR.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm F770EXR will produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
 
          Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F770EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm | 
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | 
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-05 | 
| Body design | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | EXR | 
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" | 
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 | 
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 | 
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 | 
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm | 
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch | 
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds | 
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0fps | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | BuiltIn | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 234g (0.52 pounds) | 
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-50A | 
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Cost at launch | $300 | $480 | 



