Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Released January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm S2000HD, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was released 12 months after the Fujifilm S2000HD so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-H15 grades versus the Fujifilm S2000HD with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm S2000HD | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm S2000HD
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 features outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2000HD has proportions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm S2000HD in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H15 vs the Fujifilm S2000HD.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 93 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm S2000HD.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent EX-H15 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-414mm (14.8x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $280 |