Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm SL1000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H15 was announced 4 years prior to the Fujifilm SL1000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm SL1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the Fujifilm SL1000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Fujifilm FinePix SL1000. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm SL1000
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm SL1000 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm SL1000
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 comes with exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Fujifilm SL1000 has dimensions of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") along with a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 versus Fujifilm SL1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 against the Fujifilm SL1000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm SL1000 is 93 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm SL1000.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm SL1000 to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 0cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 659 grams (1.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $600 |