Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and Z915 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was launched 13 months later than the Z915 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-H15 grades vs the Z915 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-H15 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-H15
| Z915 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Kodak Z915
| EX-H15 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 has outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Kodak Z915 has measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak Z915 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 against the Z915.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and Z915 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and Z915.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H15 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-H15 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $200 |