Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was announced 20 months earlier than the Easyshare M5370 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the Easyshare M5370 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-H15 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-H15
| Easyshare M5370 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-H15 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H15 against the Easyshare M5370.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and Easyshare M5370.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to render greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $160 |