Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and E-3 (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and E-3 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.

The EX-H15 was brought out 23 months later than the E-3 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-H15 grades versus the E-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus E-3. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus E-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus E-3
EX-H15 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 23 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Casio EX-H15
E-3 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus E-3
EX-H15 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 has outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-3 has measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 vs the E-3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and E-3 is 93 and 56 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and E-3.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-H15 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus E-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus E-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2008-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 571 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $670 |