Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the VG-160 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-H15 matches up against the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-H15 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-H15
| VG-160 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-H15 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 against the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and VG-160 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and VG-160.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files although you really should take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $90 |
