Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was brought out 12 months prior to the XZ-1 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H15 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Casio EX-H15
| XZ-1 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H15 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 comes with external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the XZ-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and XZ-1.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-H15 will render more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 275g (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $567 |