Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was announced 13 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the WG-80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H15 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-H15
| WG-80 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 150 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H15 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the WG-80.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and WG-80 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and WG-80.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $300 |