Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0e5/ee0e57c6de5b6590c0c70f89b85280638d136a77" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-H15 was launched 4 years before the NX300 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-H15 grades vs the NX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung NX300
EX-H15 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-H15
NX300 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung NX300
EX-H15 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 and the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99196/9919646c4a0925a016fc43a0b1dd41eae25d66e1" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and NX300 is 93 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/899c1/899c1aaa269f2212126d9c3b177265b2906b45b6" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and NX300.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H15 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX300 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bca6b/bca6b3aab714b9bb3b234a80b8c0b1ca8b8632e9" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d11ba/d11ba9798438cddd347ae65fe757748b3af806cc" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $750 |