Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was introduced within a month of the ST100 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-H15 matches up against the ST100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-H15 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-H15
| ST100 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung ST100
| EX-H15 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung ST100 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 vs the ST100.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and ST100 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The photograph below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and ST100.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you need to factor the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $250 |
