Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Expand to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Replacement is Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was released 5 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-H15 matches up against the SD10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-H15 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | March 2004 | More recent by 71 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-H15
| SD10 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD10
| EX-H15 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 and Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the SD10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and SD10 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and SD10.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-H15 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer EX-H15 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H15 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $198 |