Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
58 Imaging
50 Features
58 Overall
53
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 768g - 142 x 105 x 80mm
- Announced December 2007
- Superseded the Konica Minolta 7D
- Replacement is Sony A77
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A700, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the A700 (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and A700 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H15 was released 2 years after the A700 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sony A700 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the A700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A700. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Sony A700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sony A700
| EX-H15 | A700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 | December 2007 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A700 over the Casio EX-H15
| A700 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A700
| EX-H15 | A700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A700 has specifications of 142mm x 105mm x 80mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.1") having a weight of 768 grams (1.69 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 and the A700.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and A700 is 93 and 58 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and A700.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H15 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-H15 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-H15 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2007-12-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4272 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, rear curtain, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 768 grams (1.69 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 142 x 105 x 80mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 581 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | 2 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $1,000 |