Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H15 was brought out 11 months after the T900 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sony T900
| EX-H15 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | February 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-H15
| T900 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sony T900
| EX-H15 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 against the T900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and T900.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-H15 to render more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $300 |