Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was revealed 8 months after the EX-Z35 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G matches up against the EX-Z35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H20G | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-H20G
| EX-Z35 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H20G | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G offers exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the EX-Z35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and EX-Z35 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and EX-Z35.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $99 |