Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was revealed 8 months after the EX-Z35 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G matches up against the EX-Z35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H20G | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-H20G
| EX-Z35 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-Z35
| EX-H20G | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G offers exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the EX-Z35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and EX-Z35 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and EX-Z35.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $99 |