Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Casio. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the EX-Z400 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was unveiled 21 months later than the EX-Z400 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H20G grades against the EX-Z400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Casio EX-Z400
EX-H20G | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 21 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Casio EX-H20G
EX-Z400 | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Casio EX-Z400
EX-H20G | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z400 has specifications of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G against the EX-Z400.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and EX-Z400 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and EX-Z400.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-7.0 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 130g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-40 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $0 |