Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-H20G versus Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") boast different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was introduced 17 months later than the Fujifilm F200EXR making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H20G scores vs the Fujifilm F200EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 | April 2009 | Fresher by 17 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-H20G
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G provides physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has proportions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Fujifilm F200EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F200EXR is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm F200EXR.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H20G having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-H20G will give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $350 |