Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm Z33WP, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was unveiled 15 months after the Fujifilm Z33WP which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-H20G grades against the Fujifilm Z33WP for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Casio EX-H20G
| Fujifilm Z33WP | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-H20G | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z33WP has specifications of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G and Fujifilm Z33WP in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and Fujifilm Z33WP is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and Fujifilm Z33WP.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to show more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-H20G should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 110g (0.24 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $197 |