Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was announced 10 years before the E-M1 III which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-H20G matches up against the E-M1 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus E-M1 III
| EX-H20G | E-M1 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Casio EX-H20G
| E-M1 III | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 114 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+576k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus E-M1 III
| EX-H20G | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has got outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G against the E-M1 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and E-M1 III is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and E-M1 III.
All in all, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 III will render greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2020-02-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 121 |
| Cross focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 580g (1.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Storage slots | One | 2 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $1,800 |