Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was launched 4 months earlier than the XZ-1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G scores against the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H20G | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Casio EX-H20G
| XZ-1 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H20G | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the XZ-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and XZ-1.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-H20G featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-H20G will produce more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $567 |