Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced November 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX6, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and CX6 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was launched 14 months earlier than the CX6 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G scores versus the CX6 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh CX6. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh CX6
| EX-H20G | CX6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Casio EX-H20G
| CX6 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2011 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 14 months |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX6
| EX-H20G | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX6 has sizing of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G vs the CX6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and CX6 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and CX6.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lb) | 201 grams (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $595 |