Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Announced September 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-H20G was launched 7 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H20G scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-H20G GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedSeptember 2010March 2010Fresher by 7 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-H20G

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-H20G 
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-H20G GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manually focus  More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Lacking Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G features external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H20G featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-H20G will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
	
			Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-H20G
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
35
 focusing manually
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
36
 you can focus manually
 supports RAW formats
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-H20G as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
53
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 heavier than average (216 grams)
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
38
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 low fps (2.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography factors
60
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (24mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 heavier than average (216 grams)
 doesn't have selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
60
 lighter than others in class (355g)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-H20G as a Landscape photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
46
 focusing manually
 quite wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 missing Time Lapse function
47
 you can focus manually
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Vlogging features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging features
27
 quite wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 doesn't have selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 missing mic jack
 heavier than average (216 grams)
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of external mic port
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H20G Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2010-09-20 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance - 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 216 grams (0.48 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $300 $349