Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H20G was introduced 4 years prior to the WG-4 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H20G grades versus the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-H20G | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-4 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-H20G | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has got outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-H20G against the WG-4.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and WG-4.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to offer greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $330 |