Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FH22, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-850 iHS was released 4 years after the FH22 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-850 iHS scores vs the FH22 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic FH22
TG-850 iHS | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
FH22 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FH22
TG-850 iHS | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the FH22.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81042/8104217bfb338faa870225e6a9d7e6f012fddd33" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and FH22 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9b1d/b9b1d261805af21b1f37557a61fc8a40a76bb96c" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and FH22.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-850 iHS to give you more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger TG-850 iHS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d87f/1d87f52aefa6483fde0df85b879e1e32d2463e19" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ea11/1ea112eb6c7983461a67b00aa8e856bbca94d28c" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 170g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $250 | $200 |