Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was announced 3 years earlier than the DV150F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-H20G scores versus the DV150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung DV150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung DV150F
| EX-H20G | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Casio EX-H20G
| DV150F | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 28 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung DV150F
| EX-H20G | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G features physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G against the DV150F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and DV150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and DV150F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung DV150F to produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung DV150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $150 |