Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
59 Imaging
49 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was manufactured 4 years after the GX-10 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung GX-10
| EX-H20G | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 49 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 210k | Clearer screen (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-H20G
| GX-10 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung GX-10
| EX-H20G | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GX-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and GX-10.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H20G featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-H20G will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $850 |
