Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H20G was manufactured 4 years after the GX-10 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores against the GX-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung GX-10
| EX-H20G | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 49 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 210k | Clearer screen (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-H20G
| GX-10 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung GX-10
| EX-H20G | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GX-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and GX-10.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H20G featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-H20G will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $850 |