Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was introduced 21 months after the SL102 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-H20G grades against the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung SL102
| EX-H20G | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-H20G
| SL102 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung SL102
| EX-H20G | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G features exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and SL102.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H20G to result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-H20G is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $130 |