Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung SL620, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was unveiled 20 months after the SL620 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung SL620. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung SL620
EX-H20G | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | February 2009 | More modern by 20 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-H20G
SL620 | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung SL620
EX-H20G | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung SL620 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G against the SL620.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and SL620.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-H20G to deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung SL620 |
Also called as | - | PL65 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $300 | $200 |