Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was released 4 months before the ST95 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H20G scores versus the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung ST95
| EX-H20G | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-H20G
| ST95 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95
| EX-H20G | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has got exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G and the ST95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and ST95.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung ST95 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $145 |