Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was released 4 months before the ST95 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H20G scores versus the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung ST95
| EX-H20G | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-H20G
| ST95 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95
| EX-H20G | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has got exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G and the ST95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and ST95.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung ST95 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $145 |
