Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB210, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was revealed 10 months before the WB210 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-H20G grades versus the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB210
| EX-H20G | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WB210 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 10 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB210
| EX-H20G | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G offers outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G against the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and WB210.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images although you have to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $279 |
