Small Sensor Compact vs Entry-Level Mirrorless: Casio EX-H20G and Sony a5100 Face-Off

When it comes to choosing a camera, the wide spectrum of options - from tiny point-and-shoots to intricate mirrorless systems - can feel a bit like navigating a jungle with a 10x zoom lens but no map. Today, I’m comparing two cameras that could not be more different yet are often found on the same street corner of a photographer’s mind: the Casio EX-H20G, a compact superzoom from the early 2010s, and the Sony a5100, a much more recent entry-level mirrorless from 2014. Both appeal to the “enthusiast on a budget” crowd, but they couldn’t be more different beasts under the hood.

Buckle your seatbelt - this is a deep dive! We’ll dissect everything from sensor tech and build to autofocus and video capability, peppered with way more geeky insights than you’d expect from a casual camera showdown.

A Tale of Two Designs: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

Before we get into pixels and processors, let’s talk about the fundamentals - how these cameras feel in your hands, which often shapes how you use them (and how long you’ll want to stick around shooting).

The Casio EX-H20G is the quintessential bridge camera in terms of design - small sensor compact packaging with a fixed superzoom lens spanning 24-240mm equivalent. It weighs a mere 216 grams and measures 103 x 68 x 29 mm. The Sony a5100, by contrast, is a more classic “mirrorless” design - rangefinder style, with interchangeable lenses thanks to its Sony E-mount. It’s bigger (110 x 63 x 36 mm) and a bit heavier at 283 grams but still reasonably portable for a mirrorless.

Handling? The Casio’s diminutive size favors pocketability, but its thin body and absence of physical grip mean it feels a bit slippery if you have larger hands or want to shoot for extended periods. The Sony has a modest yet real grip that fits comfortably, a crucial factor when you’re aiming for stability over long shoots.

Looking at the top controls, the Sony a5100 sports a more photographer-friendly layout, featuring dedicated mode dials and buttons that invite experimentation and faster operation in the field. The Casio, as you’d expect from a compact, keeps things much simpler, relying on menus and fewer physical buttons.

In short: the Casio excels in grab-and-go simplicity and portability, while the Sony demands a tiny bit more commitment - but rewards it with better handling, richer controls, and modularity.

Sensor Size Showdown: Pixels, Quality, and Image Potential

Here’s where the gap between a small sensor compact camera and a mirrorless system truly opens up.

The EX-H20G sports a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, a common size in point-and-shoots, measuring a modest 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an area of roughly 28.07 mm² and a resolution of 14 megapixels.

The Sony a5100 rocks a substantial APS-C CMOS sensor - the same size used in many DSLRs - with dimensions of 23.5 x 15.6 mm, giving it a sensor area of 366.60 mm² and a juicy 24 megapixels.

In plain English: the Sony's sensor is more than 13 times larger in area. Why does this matter so much? Sensor size impacts:

• Dynamic range (how well you can capture detail in shadows and highlights)
• Noise performance at high ISO
• Depth of field control (bokeh potential)
• Overall image quality and detail

From my extensive testing across thousands of cameras, smaller sensors like the Casio’s tend to suffer in low light and offer limited control over background blur due to their tiny physical size. The larger APS-C sensor in the Sony not only delivers cleaner images and richer colors but also unlocks a wide range of professional-grade lenses and shooting techniques.

While the Casio’s CCD sensor has a classic charm - often rendering images with a slightly warmer or filmic feel - it lacks the versatility and image fidelity demanded by enthusiasts and pros today.

Live View and LCD Interface: Where Touch and Tilt Meet Fixed and Basic

Both cameras feature a 3-inch rear LCD, but their implementation couldn’t be more different.

The Casio’s screen is a fixed type with 461k dots resolution (not terribly sharp) and no touchscreen capability. It’s serviceable but feels clunky when composing shots.

The Sony a5100 steps confidently into the era of tilting, touch-enabled LCDs, featuring a 922k-dot display that tilts up for selfies or down to capture tricky angles. The touchscreen interface supports tap-to-focus and menu navigation, speeding up operation and enhancing user feedback.

From personal use, I can say the Sony’s screen feels like a breath of fresh air in this segment, especially if you like to shoot video, vlog, or experiment with unconventional angles. The Casio’s fixed LCD limits flexibility and user experience, making it best suited to straightforward shooting scenarios.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: nailing the shot (or not)

Autofocus (AF) performance can make or break a shoot, especially in fast-paced genres like sports or wildlife.

• The Casio EX-H20G relies solely on contrast-detection AF, supports only single AF mode (no continuous AF or tracking), and lacks face detection features. While the 10x zoom offers framing flexibility, its AF hunting is noticeable in dim light or low contrast. Also, continuous shooting isn’t supported, relegating this camera to a more deliberate, pause-and-shoot style.

• The Sony a5100 impresses significantly with a hybrid AF system combining 179 phase-detect points with contrast detection, delivering fast, precise, and reliable AF even in complex scenes. Face detection is included, though no animal eye AF (which arrived in later Sony models). Burst shooting at 6 fps means you can capture action fairly competently.

This difference becomes clear the moment you test both around moving subjects. From kids at the park to pet squirrels, the a5100 tracks continuously and locks on fast, while the Casio’s hunting AF requires patience and good lighting.

If autofocus and speed are priorities - particularly for wildlife, sports, or street photography - Sony’s system steals the show.

Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: Fixed Zoom vs Interchangeable Options

The Casio EX-H20G sports a fixed 24-240mm (10x zoom) lens with a modest aperture range of f/3.2-5.7. This setup means you get a very versatile all-in-one, excellent for travel and casual shooting - no lens changes required. However, optical quality, sharpness, and low-light performance are constrained by lens size and design compromises inherent to compact superzooms.

Sony a5100 uses the Sony E-mount lens system, boasting at least 121 lenses available (and growing, including third-party options from Sigma, Tamron, and more). This includes everything from wide-angle primes for landscapes to high-performance telephotos for wildlife, plus macro lenses.

The ability to choose lenses for specific purposes is a game-changer. Want razor-thin depth of field for portraits? Reach for a 50mm f/1.8 prime. Need weather sealing or super-telephoto reach? The choice is yours.

While the Casio’s zoom is convenient and covers a broad focal range, its fixed nature forces compromises in sharpness, bokeh quality, and creative control that a mirrorless system like the a5100 can readily eliminate.

Image Quality in Real Life: Samples and Analysis

Technical specs and sensor sizes are great, but what about the final image output?

Casio EX H20G front Casio EX H20G screen back Sony a5100 front Sony a5100 screen back

In controlled tests and varied lighting:

• Casio EX-H20G: images are decent outdoors in bright light, with respectable color rendition but limited dynamic range leading to clipped highlights or crushed shadows. Noise rises sharply beyond ISO 400, and high ISO images have significant grain and color noise. Macro shots show reasonable close focusing (~7 cm), but detail is soft.

• Sony a5100: offers genuinely clean images even at higher ISOs, thanks to its large APS-C sensor. Colors are more vibrant and natural, dynamic range significantly better, making it easy to recover details in shadows and highlights. Portraits benefit from both image quality and the ability to blur backgrounds convincingly. Video at Full HD 60p is sharp and smooth, well-suited for enthusiast vloggers.

Overall, the Sony produces more versatile, professional-grade images, while the Casio fits casual snapshots but falls short in challenging conditions.

Portrait Photography: Who Nails Skin Tones and Bokeh?

Portraiture demands smooth skin tone rendition, accurate eye detection to nail focus, and pleasing background separation (bokeh).

The Casio has neither eye-detection AF nor continuous autofocus, limiting its ability to render tack-sharp portraits with correctly focused eyes. The small sensor restricts depth-of-field control, so background blur is minimal and typically harsh if pushed via digital tricks.

The Sony a5100’s face detection autofocus ensures eyes stay razor-sharp, and the APS-C sensor combined with fast lenses enable creamy bokeh. Skin tones are well-rendered, with good color depth and minimal noise. In my hands-on portrait sessions, the a5100 consistently produced more flattering images, even in mixed lighting.

Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution Revealed

Landscape shooting thrives on sensor quality and resolution - the ability to hold fine detail from foreground to horizon.

Casio’s 14 MP sensor is fair in sharpness in bright conditions, but dynamic range is visibly limited - skies and shadows tend to clip quickly, limiting post-processing latitude.

Sony’s 24 MP APS-C sensor shines with higher resolution and dramatically improved DR (measured at 12.7 EV by DxOMark), capturing nuanced tonal gradations in trees, rocks, and water reflections. Pair with a sharp prime or wide-angle zoom, and the a5100 forms a credible landscape weapon.

Note: Neither camera offers weather sealing, which serious landscape photographers might consider essential, but Sony’s lens ecosystem includes weather-resistant glass.

Wildlife and Sports: Can These Cameras Chase the Action?

If you’re aiming to shoot birds mid-flight or action-packed games:

• The Casio EX-H20G’s absence of continuous AF and slow shutter build-up place it at a distinct disadvantage. No burst mode means rapid sequence shooting is off the table. The long zoom helps frame distant subjects, but capturing decisive moments requires luck or patience.

• Sony a5100’s fast hybrid AF, 6 fps burst mode, and tracking capabilities enable shooting wildlife or sports better, but it still lacks the professional-level speed of Sony’s higher-tier models with 10+ fps. For casual users or beginners, it's an appreciable step up.

Street and Travel Photography: Balancing Discretion, Versatility, and Battery Life

For street shooting, compactness and quick AF matter.

Casio is ultra-compact and pocketable, ready for spontaneous snaps. But lagging AF and screen limits may hinder capturing fleeting moments.

Sony is larger but still discreet and offers fast AF and silent shutter options (though no built-in EVF). Its battery life (approx 400 shots) beats many compacts. The tilting touchscreen makes travel vlogging and creative framing easier.

An advantage of the Casio is built-in GPS, useful for geotagging travel shots - Sony misses the mark here.

Video and Multimedia: HD, Stabilization, and Connectivity

Both cameras shoot HD video, but their capabilities differ widely.

The Casio shoots 720p at 30 fps, using H.264 compression, with no microphone jack or image stabilization for video. This means footage can be shaky and lacks detail compared to modern standards.

The Sony a5100 supports Full HD 1080p at up to 60 fps, includes better codec support (AVCHD and XAVC S), and relies on lens stabilization (no in-body IS). No mic input limits audio quality improvement, but the better AF in video makes it more attractive for casual videographers.

On connectivity, Casio sports Eye-Fi card support for wireless transfer and built-in GPS - features useful for travel photographers but limited today. Sony’s built-in Wi-Fi and NFC allow quick sharing and smartphone remote control, fitting modern workflows.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized; both demand care in adverse weather. The Casio’s plastic body is light but less robust, while the Sony a5100 has a more solid feel but remains an entry-level model.

Battery Life and Storage

Casio uses the NP-90 battery with no official CIPA rating available - likely modest but manageable given lower resolution video and smaller sensor.

Sony a5100 offers approximately 400 shots per charge (CIPA), respectable for mirrorless but less than some DSLRs. Both use single SD card slots, with Sony adding Memory Stick compatibility.

Pricing and Value in Today’s Market

At launch, the Casio EX-H20G retailed for around $300, while the Sony a5100 started closer to $450 (body only). Given Sony’s vastly superior sensor, autofocus, and image quality, I’d argue the a5100 represents a better long-term investment despite the price premium.

For photographers prioritizing ease of use, budget, and travel-ready superzoom, the Casio might still appeal - but for anyone serious about image quality, creative control, or future expandability, the a5100 is a smarter buy.

Performance and Final Ratings Summary

No side-by-side review would be complete without a clear summary:

And when broken down by photography genres:

Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose the Casio EX-H20G if:

• You want a pocketable, simple all-in-one camera with an extended zoom.
• You prioritize convenience over image quality or fast AF.
• You often shoot sunny daylight travel scenes and want GPS tagging.
• Your budget is tight and mirrorless feels overwhelming.

Choose the Sony a5100 if:

• You demand high image quality, dynamic range, and excellent low-light ability.
• You shoot portraits, landscapes, or action requiring fast, accurate autofocus.
• You want access to a huge, versatile lens ecosystem.
• Video shooting and modern connectivity features matter.
• You’re ready to commit to a mirrorless system that grows with your skills.

Closing Thoughts: The Evolving Camera Landscape

Comparing the Casio EX-H20G and Sony a5100 is like looking at camera tech evolution in microcosm - a compact with a small, dated sensor and minimal features versus a sprightly mirrorless system bridging entry-level users and enthusiasts.

While the Casio’s superzoom convenience and GPS are nice perks, the Sony’s sensor size, autofocus sophistication, and lens flexibility spell the future - and often the present - for serious photography.

If I had to pick one for most users today, the Sony a5100 wins hands-down - provided you don’t mind carrying a slightly bigger camera and investing in lenses. But if you want a grab-and-go camera that fits in a jacket pocket and never needs a lens swap, the Casio remains a quietly charming option from a bygone compact era.

Thanks for riding shotgun through this detailed comparison. As always, test the cameras yourself if you can - there’s no substitute for firsthand feel. But I hope this helps steer you toward the camera that fits your style, pocket, and vision best.

Happy shooting!

End of article