Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650
Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Key Specs
Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
Sony W650
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the W650 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was announced 15 months earlier than the W650 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-H20G grades vs the W650 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony W650
| EX-H20G | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Casio EX-H20G
| W650 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony W650
| EX-H20G | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony W650 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H20G against the W650.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and W650 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and W650.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony W650 to produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography info
Sony W650 Portrait photography info
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Street photography highlights
Sony W650 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (124g)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-H20G as a Sports photography camera
Sony W650 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Sony W650
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (216 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
lighter than average in class (124g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography information
Sony W650 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Vlogging details
Sony W650 Vlogging details
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (124 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $140 |