Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38


95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus FE-4000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-H30 was revealed 18 months after the FE-4000 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H30 grades against the FE-4000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Olympus FE-4000. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus FE-4000
EX-H30 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-H30
FE-4000 | EX-H30 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus FE-4000
EX-H30 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 offers physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H30 and the FE-4000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and FE-4000 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and FE-4000.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-H30 to give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-H30 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also Known as | - | X-925 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $709 | $130 |