Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus TG-810, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H30 was manufactured 7 months before the TG-810 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-H30 matches up against the TG-810 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus TG-810. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-H30 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-H30
| TG-810 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-H30 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H30 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has proportions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus TG-810 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H30 vs the TG-810.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and TG-810 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and TG-810.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H30 to give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H30 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography details
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Street photography features
Olympus TG-810 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (201g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-810 Sports photography features
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (220 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H30 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-810 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors (201g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
weather proofing
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (220 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-810 Vlogging advice
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (201 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $709 | $428 |
