Clicky

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
Casio Exilim EX-H30 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-H30 was unveiled about the same time to the VR-330 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-H30 scores against the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus VR-330

					

					

						
 EX-H30 VR-330 
Manually focus  More accurate focus
Display resolution461k460kClearer display (+1k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-H30

					

					

						
 VR-330 EX-H30 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VR-330

					

					

						
 EX-H30 VR-330 
RevealedJanuary 2011February 2011Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Lack of Touch friendly display
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H30 has got outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H30 against the VR-330.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and VR-330.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H30 to result in more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively.

						Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-H30 as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
38
 manual focus
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 no external flash support
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
33
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 provides face detect autofocus
 lack of manual focus
 no manual mode
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Street photography information
Olympus VR-330 Street photography information
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (201 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
62
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average (158 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography advice
52
 incredible zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 features tracking focus
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
47
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 provides tracking focus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography details
69
 lighter than competitors (201 grams)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (24mm)
 very long reach (300mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
70
 lighter than average (158g)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 very long reach (300mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-H30 as a Landscape photography camera
 Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
49
 manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 doesn't have Timelapse function
42
 rather wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
 no manual mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 Vlogging details
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging details
30
 decently wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (201g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have microphone support
32
 rather wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect autofocus
 lighter than average (158g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VR-330
 Casio Exilim EX-H30Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H30 Olympus VR-330
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-05 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 201g (0.44 lbs) 158g (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-130 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage - SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $709 $220