Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung TL220 front
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Samsung TL220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2009
  • Also Known as ST500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL220, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL220 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was unveiled 2 years later than the TL220 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL220 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the TL220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL220

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL220 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012August 2009More recent by 31 months
Focus manually  Dial precise focus
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 TL220 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Touch display  Easily navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL220

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL220 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outer measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the TL220.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL220 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL220.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung TL220
74
 manual focus
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 features face detect autofocus
 supports RAW formats
21
 no manual focus
 no manual exposure
 cannot use external flash
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography details
Samsung TL220 Street photography details
55
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 supports RAW formats
 screen does not articulate
 no image stabilization
 heavier than competitors in class (550g)
62
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 has focus by touch
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Sports photography with Samsung TL220
48
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
 no image stabilization
 lack of phase detect autofocus
27
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 no shutter priority mode
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography features
Samsung TL220 Travel photography features
59
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 heavier than competitors in class (550 grams)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
62
 has focus by touch
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 no Time Lapse mode
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL220 Landscape photography factors
63
 manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3 inch)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 supports RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no image stabilization
37
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no manual exposure
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 no Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging features
Samsung TL220 Vlogging features
24
 decently wide (24mm)
 features face detect autofocus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no image stabilization
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
 missing mic jack
 heavier than competitors in class (550g)
31
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 built-in touchscreen
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 no mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL220
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung TL220
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung TL220
Otherwise known as - ST500
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-02-02 2009-08-13
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance - 3.40 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 550 grams (1.21 lbs) 169 grams (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $871 $90