Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-H30 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

The EX-H30 was manufactured 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-H30 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-H30 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-H30
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-H30 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H30 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-H30 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-H30 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-H30 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $709 | $566 |