Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H30 was introduced 4 years prior to the WG-4 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-H30 scores vs the WG-4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Ricoh WG-4
EX-H30 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-H30
WG-4 | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-4
EX-H30 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the WG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The photograph below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and WG-4.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of images but you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-H30 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $709 | $330 |