Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the C135 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-S12 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the C135 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the C135 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Kodak C135

 EX-S12 C135 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display size2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kCrisper display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-S12

 C135 EX-S12 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2009Fresher by 36 months

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Kodak C135

 EX-S12 C135 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 and the C135.

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and C135 is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S12 and C135.

As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Kodak C135 to give you more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The older EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography details
Kodak C135 Portrait photography details
27
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Street photography highlights
Kodak C135 Street photography highlights
55
lighter than competitors in class (111 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
53
environment proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
maximum ISO low (1,250)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak C135 as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
31
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed focal length (35mm)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Travel photography factors
Kodak C135 Travel photography factors
56
lighter than competitors in class (111 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
64
environment proof
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Landscape photography features
Kodak C135 Landscape photography features
27
manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
31
megapixel count good (14MP)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.4 inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,250)
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging advice
Kodak C135 Vlogging advice
25
lighter than competitors in class (111 grams)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone support
25
offers face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-S12 vs Kodak C135 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Kodak C135
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Kodak EasyShare C135
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S12 Kodak EasyShare C135
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-01-08 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1250
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 35mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/3.0
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 2.4"
Resolution of display 230k dot 112k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/2s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 gr (0.24 pounds) 175 gr (0.39 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-60 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $119 $0