Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
- 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-S12 was released 3 years before the VG-145 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S12 grades against the VG-145 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S12 & Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S12 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VG-145
EX-S12 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Casio EX-S12
VG-145 | EX-S12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VG-145
EX-S12 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 provides external measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S12 and the VG-145.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S12 and VG-145 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and VG-145.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S12 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S12 | Olympus VG-145 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-7.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-60 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $119 | $0 |