Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Olympus VH-410 front
Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-S12 was launched 4 years before the VH-410 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-S12 matches up versus the VH-410 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Olympus VH-410

 EX-S12 VH-410 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-S12

 VH-410 EX-S12 
RevealedAugust 2012January 2009More recent by 44 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VH-410

 EX-S12 VH-410 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S12 offers exterior dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-S12 versus Olympus VH-410 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S12 vs the VH-410.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and VH-410 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S12 and VH-410.

As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VH-410 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-S12 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography details
Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography details
27
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
35
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Street photography factors
Olympus VH-410 Street photography factors
55
lighter than competition (111g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with focus via touch
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
41
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (111 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
68
comes with focus via touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VH-410 Landscape photography factors
28
has manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
43
rather wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S12
Vlogging with Olympus VH-410
25
lighter than competition (111g)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
33
rather wide (26mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S12 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Olympus VH-410
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Olympus VH-410
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S12 Olympus VH-410
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-08 2012-08-21
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 gr (0.24 lb) 152 gr (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-60 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $119 $186