Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Released January 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S12 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-S12 was released 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-S12 matches up against the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-S12 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-S12

 GR Digital IV EX-S12 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011January 2009Fresher by 32 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-S12 GR Digital IV 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S12 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-S12 versus the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S12 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S12 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-S12 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-S12 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-S12 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography features
27
focusing manually
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S12
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
55
lighter than competition in class (111g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 CIPA)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S12
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
56
lighter than competition in class (111g)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
great battery (390 CIPA)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
27
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
53
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
great battery (390 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
25
lighter than competition in class (111 grams)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S12 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-7.9 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 grams (0.24 lbs) 190 grams (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-60 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $119 $599