Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus E-420 front
Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-410
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-420 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was revealed 3 years prior to the E-420 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-330 scores against the E-420 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-420

 E-330 E-420 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus E-330

 E-420 E-330 
IntroducedJune 2008March 2006More modern by 27 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-420

 E-330 E-420 
Manual focus More exact focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 features outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus E-420 has specifications of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 and the E-420.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-420 is 65 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-420.

As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus E-420 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-420 as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
57
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-420 Street photography highlights
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (616g)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
64
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography info
Olympus E-420 Sports photography info
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (7MP)
39
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
not so great battery life (500 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-420 Travel photography factors
50
lighter than competition (616 grams)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
53
lighter than competition in class (426g)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
not so great battery life (500 per charge)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-420 Landscape photography factors
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
low megapixels (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
47
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inch)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
not so great battery life (500 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-420 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
9
no video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-420
 Olympus E-330Olympus E-420
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus E-420
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2006-03-18 2008-06-23
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 45
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 2.7"
Display resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 426g (0.94 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 56
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 527
Other
Battery life - 500 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Retail cost $1,100 $999