Clicky

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-S12 front
 
Samsung GX-1S front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs

Casio EX-S12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.8-7.9) lens
  • 111g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Launched January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S12 versus Samsung GX-1S, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-S12 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-S12 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S12 was introduced 3 years after the GX-1S which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S12 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-S12 scores versus the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S12 over the Samsung GX-1S

 EX-S12 GX-1S 
LaunchedJanuary 2009January 2006More modern by 37 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k210kSharper display (+20k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-S12

 GX-1S EX-S12 

Common features in the Casio EX-S12 and Samsung GX-1S

 EX-S12 GX-1S 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S12 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-S12 versus Samsung GX-1S in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S12 vs the GX-1S.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S12 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S12 and GX-1S.

Clearly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S12 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-S12 will resolve more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-S12 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung GX-1S Portrait photography highlights
27
focusing manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
51
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution not great (6MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Street photography information
Samsung GX-1S Street photography information
55
lighter than competition (111 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
60
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (605 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Sports photography features
Samsung GX-1S Sports photography features
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
39
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (6 megapixels)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S12 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (111g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
52
lighter than average in class (605g)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (6 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Landscape photography details
Samsung GX-1S Landscape photography details
28
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
manual focus
swap lenses (Pentax KAF mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (6MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S12 Vlogging information
Samsung GX-1S Vlogging information
25
lighter than competition (111g)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
9
no video shooting
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Casio EX-S12 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S12 and Samsung GX-1S
 Casio Exilim EX-S12Samsung GX-1S
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S12 Samsung GX-1S
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2009-01-08 2006-01-16
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 6MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3008 x 2008
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-7.9 -
Amount of lenses - 151
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 210 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 gr (0.24 lb) 605 gr (1.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-60 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC memory card, Internal SD/MMC card
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $119 $850